VS

Ford Puma vs Lucid Air comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 1,251 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 72,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Lucid Air?

Ford Puma vs Lucid Air: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

Lucid Air

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Lucid Air costs 72,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 48,943 £.

When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 13 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Lucid Air offers considerably more range – reaching up to 882 km, about 465 km more than the Ford Puma.

Air

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Lucid Air offers clearly more power – delivering 1,251 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 1,083 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lucid Air is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 2 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 5.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Lucid Air delivers significantly more torque with 1,940 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 1,650 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,070 kg. The difference is around 754 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Lucid Air offers moderately more boot space – 627 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 104 L.

When it comes to payload, the Lucid Air carries markedly more – 588 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Lucid Air is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,900
Air

Lucid Air

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 442 - 1,251 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 19.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 694 - 882 km
Ford Puma
Lucid Air

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Lucid Air

The Lucid Air feels like a hand-built electric limousine from the future, wrapping whisper-quiet performance and luxury in a sleek, aerodynamic shell. For buyers who want cutting-edge tech, sumptuous comfort and a quietly confident status symbol, it’s a compelling choice that makes EV ownership feel genuinely premium without shouting about it.

details
Ford Puma
Lucid Air

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
72,900 - 214,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 19.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
694 - 882 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
2,070 - 2,420 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
627 L
Length
-
Length
4,975 - 5,005 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,936 - 1,990 mm
Height
-
Height
1,409 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
430 - 588 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
442 - 1,251 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2 - 4.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 - 330 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
550 - 1,940 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
325 - 920 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Lucid
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.