Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Lynk & Co 01 – Which car suits you better?
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Ford Puma or Lynk & Co 01 fits your lifestyle better.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36900 £. That’s a price difference of around 12081 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lynk & Co 01 manages with 0.90 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 4.50 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Ford Puma performs decisively better – achieving up to 376 km, about 301 km more than the Lynk & Co 01.
01
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 276 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Lynk & Co 01 takes 7.70 s. That’s about 0.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Lynk & Co 01 tops out at 200 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 01 pulls decisively stronger with 535 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 245 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1935 kg. The difference is around 619 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 523 L compared to 466 L. That’s a difference of about 57 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1283 L, which is about 70 L more than the Lynk & Co 01.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma a bit takes the win – 469 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 54 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Lynk & Co 01 proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Lynk & Co 01 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £36,900
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
Lynk & Co 01
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Lynk & Co 01
The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.
details
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
Ford Puma
Lynk & Co 01
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Lynk & Co / Geely Auto Group
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
36900 - 40300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
20 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4545 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1694 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1213 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
276 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
535 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
206 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.