Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda 3 Sedan comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 25,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda 3 Sedan?
Ford Puma vs Mazda 3 Sedan: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is only slightly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,534 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
3 Sedan
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan offers barely more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is very slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,417 kg. The difference is around 101 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more boot space – 523 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Sedan carries only slightly more – 501 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 32 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Sedan
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mazda 3 Sedan
The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.
details
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Sedan
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
25,400 - 34,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
123 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,468 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
482 - 501 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.