Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda 3 Sedan - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 25000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda 3 Sedan?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma has a barely noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Mazda 3 Sedan costs 25000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 206 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Mazda 3 Sedan with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.10 L per 100 km.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Sedan has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 186 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mazda 3 Sedan takes 8.10 s. That’s about 0.70 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls somewhat stronger with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is minimal lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1420 kg. The difference is around 104 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers to a small extent more room – 523 L compared to 450 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.
When it comes to payload, Mazda 3 Sedan barely noticeable takes the win – 481 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Sedan
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Mazda 3 Sedan
4.7 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda 3 Sedan dresses like a compact premium car, with sculpted lines and an interior that punches well above its class. It rewards drivers with eager handling and a composed, comfortable ride that turns routine runs into something a bit more enjoyable — proof that style and substance can share the same key.
details
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Sedan
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
25000 - 34200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.1 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
123 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1420 - 1492 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1795 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
467 - 481 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.