Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda 6 Estate comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 194 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda 6 Estate?
Ford Puma vs Mazda 6 Estate: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda 6 Estate costs 30,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,086 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda 6 Estate with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
6 Estate
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Estate offers slightly more power – delivering 194 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 26 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda 6 Estate takes 8.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers moderately more torque with 290 Nm compared to 258 Nm. That’s about 32 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,475 kg. The difference is around 159 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more boot space – 523 L compared to 522 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda 6 Estate carries somewhat more – 571 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 102 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mazda 6 Estate
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mazda 6 Estate
The Mazda 6 Estate marries elegant, flowing design with everyday practicality, so you get a grown-up wagon that still looks the part on a weekend escape. It rewards drivers with poised handling and a nicely finished cabin, proving that sensible family cars can be engaging — and a little bit cheeky — too.
details
Ford Puma
Mazda 6 Estate
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
30,000 - 43,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
155 - 172 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,475 - 1,598 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
522 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,805 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,840 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,480 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,664 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
483 - 571 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
145 - 194 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
205 - 223 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
213 - 258 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
107 - 143 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,021 - 2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.