Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda 6 Saloon comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 38,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda 6 Saloon?
Ford Puma vs Mazda 6 Saloon: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda 6 Saloon costs 38,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,571 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is noticeably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the Mazda 6 Saloon. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers clearly more range – reaching up to 552 km, about 135 km more than the Ford Puma.
6 Saloon
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 6 Saloon offers noticeably more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 90 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda 6 Saloon takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda 6 Saloon delivers barely more torque with 320 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,027 kg. The difference is around 711 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 336 L. That’s a difference of about 187 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 360 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mazda 6 Saloon
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mazda 6 Saloon
The Mazda6 saloon feels like the sensible yet stylish choice for buyers who want a car that drives with poise and looks sharper than its badge suggests. It mixes engaging handling, a refined cabin and everyday practicality without shouting for attention — perfect for those who prefer understated class with a wink.
details
Ford Puma
Mazda 6 Saloon
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
38,500 - 41,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
479 - 552 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,027 - 2,028 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
336 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,921 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,491 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,074 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
359 - 360 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
245 - 258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 7.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
175 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
320 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
180 - 190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.