Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-80 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mazda CX-80?
Ford Puma vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,414 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 357 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
CX-80
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers substantially more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers substantially more torque with 550 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 260 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 815 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 181 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-80
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.