@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
VS

Ford Puma vs Mercedes A-Class – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets Mercedes A-Class.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Ford Puma

1.7 (6 Reviews)
rate

Mercedes A-Class

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Mercedes A-Class costs 32300 £. That’s a price difference of around 7491 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mercedes A-Class manages with 2.30 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 3.10 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs significantly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 291 km more than the Mercedes A-Class.

A-Class @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes A-Class has a convincingly edge – offering 320 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 152 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes A-Class is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.70 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes A-Class performs a bit better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes A-Class pulls distinct stronger with 450 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm difference.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is hardly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1440 kg. The difference is around 124 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1283 L, which is about 93 L more than the Mercedes A-Class.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes A-Class slight takes the win – 485 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes A-Class shows itself to be wins the duel decisively and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Ford Puma
Mercedes A-Class

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £32,300
A-Class @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes A-Class

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 320 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.3 - 8.3 L
  • Electric Range : 85 km

Ford Puma

1.7 (6 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Mercedes A-Class

The Mercedes A‑Class arrives as a compact charmer that dresses premium materials and a cockpit full of screens in a tidy, city-friendly package, delivering surprising agility and poise. For buyers who want a luxury badge, clever tech and a car that's equally happy in tight streets or on a spirited country run, the A‑Class offers a grown-up feel with a cheeky streak.

details
Ford Puma
Mercedes A-Class
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
A-Class @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
32300 - 55600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 8.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
85 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
12.90 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
53 - 188 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
35 - 51 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1440 - 1695 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4428 - 4447 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1796 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1407 - 1423 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1125 - 1190 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
475 - 485 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 320 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
202 - 250 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
200 - 450 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 235 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1332 - 1991 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E, G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click