Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes Citan Transporter?
Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mercedes Citan Transporter has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21700 £, while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £. That’s a price difference of around 3030 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Citan Transporter manages with 5.10 L and is therefore slight more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.30 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s convincingly more efficient than the Mercedes Citan Transporter with 18.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 5.60 kWh.
As for range, the Ford Puma performs evident better – achieving up to 376 km, about 86 km more than the Mercedes Citan Transporter.
Engine and Performance: Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a evident edge – offering 168 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter takes 11.70 s. That’s about 4.30 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Mercedes Citan Transporter tops out at 183 km/h. The difference is around 27 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma pulls minimal stronger with 290 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use: Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, the Ford Puma is barely noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1381 kg. The difference is around 65 kg.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes Citan Transporter performs convincingly better – up to 3620 L, which is about 2337 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes Citan Transporter clearly takes the win – 787 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 318 kg.
Our conclusion: The Mercedes Citan Transporter proves to be only a minor advantage and thus becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Overall, Mercedes Citan Transporter is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.
detailsThe Mercedes-Benz Citan van impresses with its versatility and compact design, making it ideal for navigating urban environments with ease. It comes equipped with a stylish yet functional interior, providing drivers with comfort and practicality for both short and long journeys. The Citan also offers advanced safety features, reflecting Mercedes-Benz's commitment to ensuring peace of mind on the road.
details|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
21700 - 33300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 156 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1381 - 1939 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4498 - 4922 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1859 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1819 - 1830 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
2900 - 3620 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
449 - 787 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1332 - 1461 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2021 - 2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.