Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes EQS SUV comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 658 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 95,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes EQS SUV?
Ford Puma vs Mercedes EQS SUV: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 71,058 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 19.6 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQS SUV. That’s a difference of about 6.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers clearly more range – reaching up to 695 km, about 278 km more than the Ford Puma.
EQS SUV
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers significantly more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 490 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers considerably more torque with 950 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 660 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 1,379 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers slightly more boot space – 645 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS SUV carries a bit more – 570 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 101 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mercedes EQS SUV
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mercedes EQS SUV
The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes EQS SUV
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,125 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
425 - 570 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
210 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.