Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes G-Class comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 605 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 106,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes G-Class?
Ford Puma vs Mercedes G-Class: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes G-Class costs 106,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 82,676 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Mercedes G-Class with 8.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 28 kWh/100km for the Mercedes G-Class. That’s a difference of about 15 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes G-Class offers slightly more range – reaching up to 479 km, about 62 km more than the Ford Puma.
G-Class
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes G-Class offers significantly more power – delivering 605 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 437 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes G-Class is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes G-Class delivers considerably more torque with 1,164 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 874 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,485 kg. The difference is around 1,169 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes G-Class offers a bit more boot space – 640 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 117 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes G-Class carries markedly more – 715 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 246 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mercedes G-Class
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mercedes G-Class
The G-Class, often called the G‑Wagen, is a blocky icon that blends unapologetic off-road prowess with a plush, modern cabin, announcing your arrival before you even step out. It’s equally at home crawling over rocks or cruising city streets, and owning one feels like adopting a very expensive, very capable personality.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes G-Class
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
106,600 - 171,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.7 - 14.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
28 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
479 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 336 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,485 - 3,085 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
640 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,931 - 1,984 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
115 - 715 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
387 - 605 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
760 - 1,164 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
285 - 445 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,989 - 3,982 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.