Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes Marco Polo comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 57,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes Marco Polo?
Ford Puma vs Mercedes Marco Polo: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes Marco Polo costs 57,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 33,571 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Marco Polo with 7.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
Marco Polo
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers visibly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.
Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 7.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Marco Polo delivers significantly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,450 kg. The difference is around 1,134 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes Marco Polo offers visibly more boot space – 670 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 147 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Marco Polo carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 181 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mercedes Marco Polo
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mercedes Marco Polo
The Mercedes Marco Polo is a posh, travel-ready camper that blends van practicality with Mercedes comfort, turning long trips into glamping adventures rather than endurance tests. Clever interior packaging and sensible luxury make it a top pick for buyers who want the prestige of a star on the grille without losing everyday usefulness.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes Marco Polo
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
57,500 - 82,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
7.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
194 - 218 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4 - 5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,450 - 2,545 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
670 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,140 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,975 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
4,630 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
555 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 10.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
188 - 220 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
380 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.