Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes SL Class comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 816 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 112,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes SL Class?
Ford Puma vs Mercedes SL Class: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes SL Class costs 112,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 88,790 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Mercedes SL Class with 9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 405 km more than the Mercedes SL Class.
SL Class
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes SL Class offers clearly more power – delivering 816 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 648 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes SL Class is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.9 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes SL Class delivers clearly more torque with 1,420 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 1,130 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is visibly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 494 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers significantly more boot space – 523 L compared to 240 L. That’s a difference of about 283 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries visibly more – 469 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 94 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Mercedes SL Class
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mercedes SL Class
The Mercedes SL blends timeless elegance with a cheeky sense of occasion, its retractable roof turning any commute into a small celebratory parade. Behind the wheel it behaves like a grown-up sports car that prefers comfort and presence over headline-grabbing bravado, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want to arrive in style.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes SL Class
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
112,700 - 219,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
9 - 13.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
12 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
206 - 309 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Roadster
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,195 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
110 - 240 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,915 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
145 - 375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
435 - 816 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.9 - 4.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 1,420 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 8
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
320 - 600 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,991 - 3,982 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.