Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Mercedes Vito Transporter comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 237 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 28,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mercedes Vito Transporter?
Ford Puma vs Mercedes Vito Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mercedes Vito Transporter costs 28,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,868 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is substantially more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Transporter. That’s a difference of about 8.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers a bit more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 57 km more than the Ford Puma.
Vito Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,916 kg. The difference is around 600 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries considerably more – 884 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 415 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £28,800
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Ford Puma
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Ford Puma
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.