Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs MG Cyberster comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 510 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 55,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG Cyberster?
Ford Puma vs MG Cyberster: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the MG Cyberster costs 55,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 31,791 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.7 kWh/100km for the MG Cyberster. That’s a difference of about 3.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the MG Cyberster offers moderately more range – reaching up to 507 km, about 90 km more than the Ford Puma.
Cyberster
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MG Cyberster offers substantially more power – delivering 510 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 342 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG Cyberster is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.2 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 4.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Cyberster delivers significantly more torque with 725 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 435 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 2.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,960 kg. The difference is around 644 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 200 L. That’s a difference of about 323 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries considerably more – 469 kg compared to 150 kg. That’s a difference of about 319 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
MG Cyberster
The Cyberster is a striking new addition to the electric vehicle landscape, captivating enthusiasts with its sleek design and sporty silhouette. This all-electric convertible combines innovative technology with an exhilarating driving experience, making it a standout choice for those who crave adventure. With its commitment to sustainability and performance, the Cyberster is poised to redefine the way we think about modern roadsters.
details
Ford Puma
MG Cyberster
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
55,700 - 60,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.7 - 19.1 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
443 - 507 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Roadster
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
2
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,960 - 2,060 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
200 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,913 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
150 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
340 - 510 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.2 - 5.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
475 - 725 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
250 - 375 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MG
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.