VS

Ford Puma vs Micro Microlino comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 17 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Micro Microlino?

Ford Puma vs Micro Microlino: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • substantially more trunk space
details

Micro Microlino

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Micro Microlino is clearly cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,494 £.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 189 km more than the Micro Microlino.

Microlino

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers clearly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 17 HP. That’s roughly 151 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers significantly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 89 Nm. That’s about 201 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Micro Microlino is substantially lighter – 596 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 720 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers substantially more boot space – 523 L compared to 230 L. That’s a difference of about 293 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries substantially more – 469 kg compared to 154 kg. That’s a difference of about 315 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Fiat Topolino
Micro Microlino
VS
Choosing between the Topolino and the Microlino is a choice between a modern, conventionally styled city car rooted in Fiat’s small-car heritage and an ultra-compact, retro-inspired electric microcar built specifically for short urban hops. I’ll walk you through the key differences in driving …
Ford Puma
Micro Microlino

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Micro Microlino

The Micro Microlino is a delightful retro-styled city runabout that feels like a modern reinterpretation of a classic bubble car, perfect for threading through tight streets and turning heads at every junction. It’s unabashedly charming and ideal for urban life, but buyers should embrace the playful simplicity over family-hauler practicality.

details
serpimg_V70WNm

Reviews Micro Microlino

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
VS
The Ford Puma and the VW T‑Roc are two top choices in the compact crossover segment, but they deliver different strengths — the Puma leans sporty and driver-focused while the T‑Roc prioritises space and refinement. This quick comparison will highlight how their performance, practicality and tech …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
Ford Puma
VW Taigo
VS
The Ford Puma and Volkswagen Taigo are compact crossover SUVs that bring raised ride height and SUV styling to the city-friendly hatchback segment. This comparison looks at driving feel, practicality, efficiency and equipment to help you decide which one better matches your priorities.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
MG MG4 Urban
VS
The Ford Puma and the MG4 Urban both aim at compact, practical motoring but take very different approaches: the Puma is a petrol-powered crossover that favors ride comfort and versatility, while the MG4 Urban is an affordable electric hatch focused on efficiency and tech value. This comparison will …
Ford Puma
Micro Microlino

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
15,400 - 22,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
93 - 228 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback, Convertible
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
596 - 630 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
230 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,473 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
120 - 154 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
8 - 17 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
89 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
6 - 12 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Micro
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.