VS

Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi ASX comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Mitsubishi ASX?

Ford Puma vs Mitsubishi ASX: Key differences

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate
  • minimal more power
  • evident quicker from 0–100 km/h

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • distinct more efficient
  • slight lighter
  • minimal more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi ASX has a somewhat advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 24800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3351 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi ASX manages with 4.40 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1 L per 100 km.

ASX

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a minimal edge – offering 168 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 10 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.90 s. That’s about 1.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Ford Puma pulls a bit stronger with 290 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 45 Nm difference.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is slight lighter – 1296 kg compared to 1316 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers minimal more room – 484 L compared to 456 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, Ford Puma slight takes the win – 469 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Ford Puma
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km

Ford Puma

2.9 (10 Reviews)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
Ford Puma
Mitsubishi ASX

Costs and Consumption

Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
21400 - 32500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
99 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1296 - 1493 kg
Trunk capacity
456 L
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
-
Width
1805 mm
Width
1797 mm
Height
1550 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
397 - 445 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3

General

Model Year
2025 - 2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mitsubishi
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.