Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs NIO EL8 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 71,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or NIO EL8?
Ford Puma vs NIO EL8: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the NIO EL8 costs 71,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 47,143 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is substantially more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the NIO EL8. That’s a difference of about 8.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO EL8 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 93 km more than the Ford Puma.
EL8
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL8 offers substantially more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 485 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO EL8 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO EL8 delivers considerably more torque with 850 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: NIO EL8 offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,613 kg. The difference is around 1,297 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 265 L. That’s a difference of about 258 L.
When it comes to payload, the NIO EL8 carries slightly more – 577 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 108 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
NIO EL8
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
NIO EL8
The NIO EL8 feels like a tech-savvy living room on wheels, blending upscale comfort with playful design for buyers who want electric refinement without the clinical vibe. It’s roomy, packed with clever features and a relaxed driving character that turns everyday trips into something a little more fun.
details
Ford Puma
NIO EL8
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
71,100 - 90,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
390 - 510 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,613 - 2,633 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
265 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,099 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,989 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,750 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
810 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
557 - 577 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
653 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
850 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
480 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
NIO
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.