Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Peugeot 508 - Differences and prices compared
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Peugeot 508 costs 44600 £. That’s a price difference of around 19800 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Peugeot 508 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 3.80 L per 100 km.
As for range, the Ford Puma performs convincingly better – achieving up to 376 km, about 321 km more than the Peugeot 508.
508
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot 508 has a clearly edge – offering 360 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 192 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Peugeot 508 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 5.20 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.20 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Peugeot 508 performs somewhat better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Peugeot 508 pulls convincingly stronger with 520 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 230 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .
In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly perceptible lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1811 kg. The difference is around 495 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers slight more room – 523 L compared to 487 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Peugeot 508 performs somewhat better – up to 1537 L, which is about 254 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, takes the win – compared to . That’s a difference of about .
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Peugeot 508 shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £44,600
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Peugeot 508
Ford Puma
Peugeot 508
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Peugeot 508
The Peugeot 508 turns heads with a low-slung, almost coupe-like silhouette and a cabin that feels grown-up and surprisingly premium for the money. On the road it balances comfort and poise with a playful edge, making it a convincing choice for buyers who want something stylish and sensible without shouting for attention.
details
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
Ford Puma
Peugeot 508
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ Peugeot / Stellantis Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
44600 - 60800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
46 - 55 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
36 - 45 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1811 - 1941 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
487 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4750 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1859 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1403 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1537 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
379 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
180 - 360 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
230 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
133 - 265 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.