Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Peugeot Expert Transporter comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 180 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 32,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot Expert Transporter?
Ford Puma vs Peugeot Expert Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Peugeot Expert Transporter costs 32,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,216 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Peugeot Expert Transporter with 6.2 L/100km. The difference is about 0.8 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 23.6 kWh/100km for the Peugeot Expert Transporter. That’s a difference of about 10.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 65 km more than the Peugeot Expert Transporter.
Expert Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Peugeot Expert Transporter offers very slightly more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Peugeot Expert Transporter takes 10.5 s. That’s about 3.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Expert Transporter delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,722 kg. The difference is around 406 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Expert Transporter carries substantially more – 1,226 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 757 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Peugeot Expert Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Peugeot Expert Transporter
The Peugeot Expert is a practical, no-nonsense work van that combines a car‑like driving feel with a tough, flexible load area — perfect for tradespeople who want comfort on the road and durability on the job. It won’t turn heads for glamour, but its sensible packaging, clever storage and dependable nature make it a smart, low-drama choice for buyers who need a proper transporter.
details
Ford Puma
Peugeot Expert Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
32,100 - 48,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.2 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23.6 - 24 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
221 - 352 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 172 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,722 - 2,260 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
840 - 1,226 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
120 - 180 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.5 - 11.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
88 - 132 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 2,184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.