Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Peugeot Rifter comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 22,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Peugeot Rifter?
Ford Puma vs Peugeot Rifter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Peugeot Rifter is very slightly cheaper – starting at 22,900 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,054 £.
Both cars consume an average of 5.4 L/100km – no difference here.
Rifter
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 38 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Peugeot Rifter takes 11.3 s. That’s about 3.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Peugeot Rifter delivers very slightly more torque with 300 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Peugeot Rifter offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is moderately lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,498 kg. The difference is around 182 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Peugeot Rifter offers significantly more boot space – 1,050 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 527 L.
When it comes to payload, the Peugeot Rifter carries significantly more – 814 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 345 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Peugeot Rifter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Peugeot Rifter
The Peugeot Rifter is a practical, family-friendly people carrier that makes everyday errands and weekend escapes feel effortless thanks to its airy cabin and clever, flexible interior. With chunky, purposeful styling and storage solutions everywhere, the Rifter manages to be both unashamedly useful and unexpectedly likeable.
details
Ford Puma
Peugeot Rifter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
22,900 - 30,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
142 - 157 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,694 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
322 - 1,050 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
518 - 814 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
102 - 130 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.3 - 13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
75 - 96 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Peugeot
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.