VS

Ford Puma vs Porsche Cayenne – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: Ford Puma or Porsche Cayenne?

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

In the ever-evolving world of the automotive industry, the competition between compact SUVs and luxury performance vehicles is heating up. Today, we compare the Ford Puma and the Porsche Cayenne, two models that embody distinct philosophies within the SUV segment. While the Puma is focused on efficiency and practicality, the Cayenne represents a fusion of performance and luxury.

Cayenne @ Porsche Media Deutschland

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Puma boasts a compact yet sporty design, measuring 4186 mm in length and 1805 mm in width, making it perfect for urban settings. With a height of 1550 mm, it offers a commanding view of the road while still being manageable for city driving. In contrast, the Porsche Cayenne is a full-sized luxury SUV, measuring a substantial 4930 mm in length and 1989 mm in width, with a height ranging from 1652 mm to 1698 mm. This size provides a more spacious interior and a powerful road presence.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Powertrain and Performance

The Ford Puma comes equipped with a variety of efficient powertrains, including petrol MHEV and electric options. The engine choices range from 125 to 168 hp, paired with either a manual or dual-clutch automatic transmission, providing acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h in as quickly as 7.4 seconds. With a front-wheel-drive configuration, the Puma delivers a fuel consumption of between 5.4 to 6.0 L/100km and an electric range of up to 376 km.

In stark contrast, the Porsche Cayenne offers a more powerful lineup, featuring petrol and plug-in hybrid variants with power outputs from 353 to a staggering 739 hp. The Cayenne's all-wheel-drive system enhances its performance, allowing it to accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 3.6 seconds. However, this performance comes at a cost, with fuel consumption ranging from a mere 1.4 L/100km (for the hybrid) up to 12.6 L/100km for traditional petrol variants.

Cayenne @ Porsche Media Deutschland

Interior and Technology

Inside, the Ford Puma is designed with practicality in mind, offering a trunk capacity of 456 to 523 liters, which is quite generous for a compact SUV. The cabin is equipped with modern technology, including Ford's latest infotainment system, providing a seamless connection to smartphones and navigation systems for both driver and passengers.

The Porsche Cayenne, on the other hand, is the epitome of luxury and technology. With an interior that features high-quality materials and advanced infotainment options, the Cayenne allows drivers to personalize their experience. The trunk capacity can range from 434 to 772 liters, providing ample space for all your travel needs. The Cayenne also incorporates cutting-edge driving assistance features, enhancing safety and driving comfort.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Innovations and Sustainability

Both vehicles incorporate innovative technologies but cater to different markets. The Ford Puma emphasizes its electric and hybrid systems, reflecting the current trend towards sustainability. Its integration of mild-hybrid technology not only adds efficiency but also contributes to a lower CO2 output, with some models reaching an efficiency class of A.

The Porsche Cayenne introduces high-performance electric options while maintaining its luxury appeal. The plug-in hybrid models offer substantial electric ranges of around 74 km, making it more practical for daily driving. This balance allows the Cayenne to remain competitive in an increasingly eco-conscious market while delivering class-leading performance.

Cayenne @ Porsche Media Deutschland

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Ford Puma and Porsche Cayenne represent two very different facets of the SUV world. The Puma appeals to those seeking a compact and efficient vehicle that does not compromise on style and practicality. Meanwhile, the Cayenne caters to luxury enthusiasts wanting exhilarating performance and advanced technology. The choice between the two ultimately comes down to what the driver values most—versatility and efficiency versus luxury and power.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Porsche Cayenne costs 87000 £. That’s a price difference of around 62229 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Porsche Cayenne manages with 4 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Ford Puma performs decisively better – achieving up to 376 km, about 293 km more than the Porsche Cayenne.

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Porsche Cayenne has a convincingly edge – offering 739 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 571 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.60 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Porsche Cayenne performs distinct better – reaching 305 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 95 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Porsche Cayenne pulls significantly stronger with 950 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 660 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is convincingly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2130 kg. The difference is around 814 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Porsche Cayenne offers distinct more room – 772 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 249 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Porsche Cayenne performs distinct better – up to 1708 L, which is about 425 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Porsche Cayenne noticeable takes the win – 705 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 236 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Porsche Cayenne shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £87,000
P17_0701

Porsche Cayenne

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 353 - 739 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 12.2 L
  • Electric Range : 74 - 83 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Porsche Cayenne

Der Porsche Cayenne präsentiert sich als beeindruckender Vertreter der Premium-SUVs und verbindet kraftvolles Design mit luxuriösem Komfort. Sein dynamisches Fahrverhalten und die hochwertigen Materialien im Innenraum machen jede Fahrt zu einem besonderen Erlebnis. Zudem bietet der Cayenne modernste Technologiefunktionen, die sowohl Unterhaltung als auch Sicherheit gewährleisten.

details
P17_0701 @ Porsche Media Deutschland
P17_0780 @ Porsche Media Deutschland
P17_0777 @ Porsche Media Deutschland
P17_0776 @ Porsche Media Deutschland
P17_0784 @ Porsche Media Deutschland

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
Porsche Cayenne
Puma
Cayenne

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
87000 - 186400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4 - 12.2 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
74 - 83 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
21.80 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
90 - 277 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 90 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
2130 - 2670 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
434 - 772 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4930 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1983 - 1989 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1652 - 1698 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1344 - 1708 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
365 - 705 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
353 - 739 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 6 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
248 - 305 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
500 - 950 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
260 - 544 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
2995 - 3996 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
Porsche

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Alfa Romeo Junior
Ford Puma
VS
The Alfa Romeo Junior offers a stylish blend of Italian design and spirited performance, appealing to enthusiasts looking for a dynamic driving experience. In contrast, the Ford Puma impresses with its practicality and advanced technology features, making it a versatile choice for everyday use. While the Junior captivates with its heritage and sportiness, the Puma excels in comfort and reliability, catering to different segments of the market.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Peugeot 208
VS
In the compact crossover segment, the Ford Puma impresses with its dynamic design and agile handling, making it an attractive option for city dwellers seeking both style and practicality. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 208, known for its elegant interior and efficient engine options, offers a compelling blend of technology and comfort that appeals to urban drivers. Ultimately, choosing between the Puma and the 208 comes down to prioritizing either the sporty performance of the Ford or the sophisticated refinement of the Peugeot.
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Ford Puma showcases a sporty design and dynamic handling, appealing to those who crave a fun driving experience. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross emphasizes practicality and interior space, making it a top choice for families seeking comfort on the road. Both vehicles offer impressive tech features, but their differing approaches to style and functionality make this comparison a compelling one for potential buyers.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.