Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Porsche Cayenne - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 1156 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 87000 £) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Porsche Cayenne?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Porsche Cayenne costs 87000 £. That’s a price difference of around 62229 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Porsche Cayenne manages with 4 L and is therefore distinct more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 1.40 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s significantly more efficient than the Porsche Cayenne with 19.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 6.60 kWh.
As for range, the Porsche Cayenne performs decisively better – achieving up to 642 km, about 266 km more than the Ford Puma.
Cayenne
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Porsche Cayenne has a convincingly edge – offering 1156 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 988 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.50 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 4.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Porsche Cayenne performs distinct better – reaching 305 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 95 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Porsche Cayenne pulls significantly stronger with 1500 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 1210 Nm difference.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is convincingly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2130 kg. The difference is around 814 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Porsche Cayenne offers distinct more room – 781 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 258 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Porsche Cayenne performs distinct better – up to 1708 L, which is about 425 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Porsche Cayenne noticeable takes the win – 705 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 236 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Porsche Cayenne shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £87,000
Porsche Cayenne
Ford Puma
Porsche Cayenne
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Porsche Cayenne
Few SUVs blend athletic poise and Teutonic precision like the Porsche Cayenne, putting genuine sports‑car feeling into a roomy, everyday package. If you want a practical family hauler that still makes you grin every time you merge, the Cayenne delivers — turning errands into an excuse for a spirited drive.
details
Ford Puma
Porsche Cayenne
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
87000 - 186400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 12.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.7 - 20.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
74 - 642 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
21.80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 277 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 90 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
2130 - 2720 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
434 - 781 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4930 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1980 - 1989 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1652 - 1698 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1344 - 1708 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
365 - 705 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
353 - 1156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.5 - 6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
248 - 305 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 1500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
6 - 8
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
260 - 850 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2995 - 3996 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B, C, A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Porsche
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.