VS

Ford Puma vs Porsche Macan comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 571 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 89,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Porsche Macan?

Ford Puma vs Porsche Macan: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Porsche Macan

3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • noticeably more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Porsche Macan costs 89,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 65,400 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 18.5 kWh/100km for the Porsche Macan. That’s a difference of about 5.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Porsche Macan offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 585 km, about 168 km more than the Ford Puma.

Macan

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Porsche Macan offers substantially more power – delivering 571 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 403 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Porsche Macan is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Porsche Macan delivers considerably more torque with 955 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 665 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,470 kg. The difference is around 1,154 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers marginally more boot space – 523 L compared to 476 L. That’s a difference of about 47 L.

When it comes to payload, the Porsche Macan carries barely more – 470 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Porsche Macan

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Porsche Macan

The Porsche Macan feels like a compact sports car dressed in SUV clothes, delivering razor-sharp handling and a cabin that somehow mixes luxury with everyday practicality. For buyers who crave driving thrills without sacrificing usability, the Macan is a rare breed that makes running errands feel like a weekend blast and manages to look smugly good in the process.

details
Ford Puma
Porsche Macan

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
89,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
585 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
2,470 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
476 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,952 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
470 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
571 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
955 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
420 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Porsche
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.