Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault Trafic Transporter comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 38,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Trafic Transporter?
Ford Puma vs Renault Trafic Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault Trafic Transporter costs 38,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,183 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Renault Trafic Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the Renault Trafic Transporter. That’s a difference of about 8.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 99 km more than the Renault Trafic Transporter.
Trafic Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Trafic Transporter offers only slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Trafic Transporter delivers visibly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,848 kg. The difference is around 532 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries considerably more – 1,222 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 753 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Renault Trafic Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Renault Trafic Transporter
The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.
details
Ford Puma
Renault Trafic Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 184 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3 - 6
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,956 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.