VS

Ford Puma vs Rolls-Royce Ghost comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 600 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 276,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Rolls-Royce Ghost?

Ford Puma vs Rolls-Royce Ghost: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Ghost

1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Ghost costs 276,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 252,943 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Ghost with 15.3 L/100km. The difference is about 9.9 L/100km.

Ghost

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Ghost offers clearly more power – delivering 600 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 432 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Ghost is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Ghost delivers clearly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 610 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,490 kg. The difference is around 1,174 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Rolls-Royce Ghost

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Rolls-Royce Ghost

The Ghost is a stunning representation of luxury and sophistication, embodying the essence of Rolls-Royce's craftsmanship. With its serene ride and opulent interior, it offers an unparalleled driving experience that envelops occupants in a world of comfort. Every detail, from the meticulously designed dashboard to the whisper-quiet engine, reflects the brand's commitment to excellence and elegance.

details
serpimg_kqT95g

Reviews Rolls-Royce Ghost

1 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
VW T-Roc
VS
The Ford Puma and the VW T‑Roc are two top choices in the compact crossover segment, but they deliver different strengths — the Puma leans sporty and driver-focused while the T‑Roc prioritises space and refinement. This quick comparison will highlight how their performance, practicality and tech …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Bayon
VS
Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon are compact crossover rivals that blend city-friendly dimensions with SUV styling and efficient engines. This quick comparison highlights how they differ in driving feel, cabin practicality, equipment and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your daily needs.
Ford Puma
Kia XCeed
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia XCeed are two of the sharper compact crossovers on the market, each mixing car-like driving manners with useful everyday practicality. This comparison looks at driving dynamics, interior quality, space and running costs so you can pick the one that fits your lifestyle.
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
Opel Astra
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Vauxhall Astra comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with a sporty, raised stance or a more conventional family hatch with roomy practicality. The Puma brings a higher driving position and clever cargo solutions, while the Astra focuses on space, …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Nissan Micra
VS
The Ford Puma and Nissan Micra both aim at city-minded drivers but take different paths: the Puma is a compact crossover that prioritises space, ride comfort and practicality, while the Micra is a small hatchback built around affordability, simplicity and easy urban manoeuvring. Choose the Puma if …
Ford Puma
Rolls-Royce Ghost

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
276,900 - 334,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
15.3 - 15.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
346 - 357 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
2,490 - 2,530 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
2,148 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
571 - 600 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 4.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
850 - 900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
12
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
420 - 441 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.