Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Rolls-Royce Phantom comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 571 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 445,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Rolls-Royce Phantom?
Ford Puma vs Rolls-Royce Phantom: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Phantom costs 445,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 421,800 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Rolls-Royce Phantom with 15.5 L/100km. The difference is about 10.1 L/100km.
Phantom
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers substantially more power – delivering 571 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 403 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Phantom is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.3 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Phantom delivers considerably more torque with 900 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 610 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,560 kg. The difference is around 1,244 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Rolls-Royce Phantom offers very slightly more boot space – 548 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries very slightly more – 469 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 29 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Rolls-Royce Phantom
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Rolls-Royce Phantom
The Phantom stands as the epitome of luxury and craftsmanship, effortlessly merging opulence with unparalleled performance. With its iconic design and attention to detail, this flagship sedan commands respect on the road while cocooning its passengers in sumptuous comfort. Every journey in the Phantom is an experience, where timeless elegance meets cutting-edge technology.
details
Ford Puma
Rolls-Royce Phantom
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
445,700 - 514,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
15.5 - 15.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
351 - 361 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,560 - 2,610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
548 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
2,018 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
390 - 440 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
571 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.3 - 5.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
900 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
12
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
420 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
6,749 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Rolls-Royce
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.