VS

Ford Puma vs Rolls-Royce Spectre comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 585 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 333,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Rolls-Royce Spectre?

Ford Puma vs Rolls-Royce Spectre: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • considerably lighter
details

Rolls-Royce Spectre

  • clearly more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Rolls-Royce Spectre costs 333,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 309,514 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is significantly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 22.2 kWh/100km for the Rolls-Royce Spectre. That’s a difference of about 9.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Rolls-Royce Spectre offers visibly more range – reaching up to 530 km, about 113 km more than the Ford Puma.

Spectre

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Rolls-Royce Spectre offers clearly more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 417 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Rolls-Royce Spectre is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Rolls-Royce Spectre delivers significantly more torque with 900 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 610 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,890 kg. The difference is around 1,574 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Rolls-Royce Spectre carries barely more – 510 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 41 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Rolls-Royce Spectre

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

Rolls-Royce Spectre

The Spectre is an extraordinary embodiment of luxury and innovation, melding classic craftsmanship with cutting-edge electric performance. With its striking design and meticulously curated interior, this grand tourer offers an unparalleled driving experience that redefines opulence on the road. As a testament to the brand's commitment to a sustainable future, the Spectre seamlessly combines elegance with eco-consciousness, making it a true marvel in the world of automotive excellence.

details
Ford Puma
Rolls-Royce Spectre

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
333,400 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
22.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
530 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
4
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
2,890 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
2,017 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
510 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
585 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
900 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
430 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Rolls-Royce
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.