Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Octavia Limousine comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 25,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Octavia Limousine?
Ford Puma vs Skoda Octavia Limousine: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is barely cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Skoda Octavia Limousine costs 25,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,063 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Octavia Limousine uses 4.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
Octavia Limousine
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Octavia Limousine offers a bit more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Octavia Limousine is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.6 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Octavia Limousine delivers a bit more torque with 360 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,351 kg. The difference is around 35 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Octavia Limousine offers somewhat more boot space – 600 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Octavia Limousine carries slightly more – 545 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 76 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Octavia Limousine is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £25,000
Skoda Octavia Limousine
Ford Puma
Skoda Octavia Limousine
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Skoda Octavia Limousine
The Skoda Octavia Limousine blends space and sensible charm into a calm, grown-up package that feels smarter than its modest badge suggests. Practical, comfortable and quietly clever, it's the sort of car that makes everyday driving feel noticeably less mundane and keeps both your wallet and patience intact.
details
Ford Puma
Skoda Octavia Limousine
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
25,000 - 39,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
111 - 154 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,351 - 1,537 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
600 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,829 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
503 - 545 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 204 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.6 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
220 - 360 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 150 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.