Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Skoda Superb Limousine comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 35,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Skoda Superb Limousine?
Ford Puma vs Skoda Superb Limousine: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Skoda Superb Limousine costs 35,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,143 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Superb Limousine uses 1.2 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers considerably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 277 km more than the Skoda Superb Limousine.
Superb Limousine
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers visibly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Superb Limousine is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.6 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Superb Limousine delivers visibly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is moderately lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,559 kg. The difference is around 243 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Superb Limousine offers slightly more boot space – 645 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Superb Limousine carries somewhat more – 580 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 111 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Superb Limousine is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £35,100
Skoda Superb Limousine
Ford Puma
Skoda Superb Limousine
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Skoda Superb Limousine
The Skoda Superb is the quietly imposing saloon that turns everyday practicality into tasteful luxury, with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and a boot that swallows groceries and luggage with military discipline. For buyers who want executive presence without the badge snobbery, it’s a clever, polished choice that rewards sensible thinking with genuine comfort and pragmatic charm.
details
Ford Puma
Skoda Superb Limousine
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
35,100 - 52,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
1.2 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
131 - 140 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
26 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,559 - 1,896 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
486 - 645 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,849 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
441 - 580 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.