Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs smart #3 – Differences & prices compared
Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or smart #3?
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the smart #3 costs 34700 £. That’s a price difference of around 9934 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the smart #3 with 16.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.20 kWh.
As for range, the smart #3 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 455 km, about 79 km more than the Ford Puma.
#3
@ smart Europe GmbH
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 has a decisively edge – offering 428 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 260 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.70 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the smart #3 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: smart #3 pulls decisively stronger with 584 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 294 Nm difference.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1780 kg. The difference is around 464 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly perceptible more room – 523 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 153 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Ford Puma performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1283 L, which is about 123 L more than the smart #3.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma minimal takes the win – 469 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
Who wins the race?
The smart #3 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
smart #3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £34,700
@ smart Europe GmbH
smart #3
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
smart #3
The Smart #3 represents a bold evolution in urban mobility, merging sleek design with sustainability. This compact electric SUV boasts a modern silhouette and advanced technology features that make city driving both efficient and enjoyable. With its spacious interior and innovative connectivity options, the Smart #3 is poised to redefine the expectations for eco-friendly urban transport.
details
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
@ smart Europe GmbH
Ford Puma
smart #3
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
@ smart Europe GmbH
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
34700 - 45800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
325 - 455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
47 - 62 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1780 - 1910 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4400 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1844 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1556 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1160 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
419 - 450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 584 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
smart
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.