Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs smart #3 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 42,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or smart #3?
Ford Puma vs smart #3: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the smart #3 costs 42,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,077 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is noticeably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 16.3 kWh/100km for the smart #3. That’s a difference of about 3.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the smart #3 offers marginally more range – reaching up to 455 km, about 38 km more than the Ford Puma.
#3
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #3 offers visibly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 104 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #3 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #3 delivers clearly more torque with 384 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 94 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 494 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 370 L. That’s a difference of about 153 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 450 kg. That’s a difference of about 19 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
smart #3
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
smart #3
The Smart #3 turns the brand's cheeky city-car attitude into a grown-up compact SUV, pairing sleek styling with a surprisingly roomy, well-made interior. It's a brilliant pick for buyers who want electric ease without dullness — practical enough for daily life, but still lively enough to make parking and grocery runs feel a little fun.
details
Ford Puma
smart #3
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
42,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
455 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
370 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,844 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
450 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
384 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
smart
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.