Compare performance (168 HP vs 202 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 28,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or SsangYong Musso?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is noticeably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the SsangYong Musso costs 28,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,791 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the SsangYong Musso with 8.4 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the SsangYong Musso offers somewhat more power – delivering 202 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the SsangYong Musso delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is significantly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 729 kg.
When it comes to payload, the SsangYong Musso carries considerably more – 1,010 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 541 kg.
The Ford Puma shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
detailsThe Musso is a no-nonsense pickup that blends rugged capability with surprisingly comfy cabin manners, perfect for buyers who want practicality over prestige. It may not turn heads at the coffee stop, but its sensible layout, useful load space and low running costs make it a very pragmatic choice for workdays and weekends.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
28,700 - 42,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
8.4 - 9.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
221 - 245 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
75 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,260 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,095 - 5,405 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,950 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,840 - 1,855 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
785 - 1,010 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
202 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
183 - 187 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
149 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,157 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
SsangYong
|