Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Subaru Solterra comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 39,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Subaru Solterra?
Ford Puma vs Subaru Solterra: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Subaru Solterra costs 39,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 15,506 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is moderately more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 14.6 kWh/100km for the Subaru Solterra. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Subaru Solterra offers slightly more range – reaching up to 511 km, about 94 km more than the Ford Puma.
Solterra
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Subaru Solterra offers substantially more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 175 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Subaru Solterra is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.1 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Subaru Solterra delivers clearly more torque with 437 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 147 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,117 kg. The difference is around 801 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers moderately more boot space – 523 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 71 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries only slightly more – 469 kg compared to 468 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Subaru Solterra leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £39,400
Subaru Solterra
Ford Puma
Subaru Solterra
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Subaru Solterra
The Subaru Solterra translates Subaru's rugged, go-anywhere character into an electric package, offering sure-footed handling and a thoughtfully practical cabin that feels ready for weekend escapes. It isn't trying to outshine flashier rivals — instead it stakes its claim on reliability and friendly simplicity, making it a sensible, slightly cheeky choice for buyers who want an EV that behaves like a Subaru.
details
Ford Puma
Subaru Solterra
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
39,400 - 45,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.6 - 15.8 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
471 - 511 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,117 - 2,154 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,860 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
431 - 468 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
343 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
437 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
252 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Subaru
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.