Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota C-HR+?
Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,077 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is only slightly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 13.4 kWh/100km for the Toyota C-HR+. That’s a difference of about 0.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 190 km more than the Ford Puma.
C-HR+
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers considerably more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 175 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers a bit more torque with 338 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 48 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is markedly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 494 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers visibly more boot space – 523 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 107 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries visibly more – 655 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 186 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Toyota C-HR+ is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,000
Toyota C-HR+
Ford Puma
Toyota C-HR+
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Toyota C-HR+
The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.
details
Ford Puma
Toyota C-HR+
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
416 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,870 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
550 - 655 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.