Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Toyota Land Cruiser comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 70700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Land Cruiser?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the Toyota Land Cruiser costs 70700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 45934 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Ford Puma manages with 5.40 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Toyota Land Cruiser with 10.60 L. The difference is about 5.20 L per 100 km.
Land Cruiser
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Land Cruiser has a a bit edge – offering 205 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Toyota Land Cruiser takes 12.30 s. That’s about 4.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs to a small extent better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Toyota Land Cruiser tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Toyota Land Cruiser pulls clearly stronger with 500 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm difference.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Toyota Land Cruiser offers distinct more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is decisively lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2610 kg. The difference is around 1294 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Toyota Land Cruiser offers clearly perceptible more room – 742 L compared to 456 L. That’s a difference of about 286 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Toyota Land Cruiser performs clearly perceptible better – up to 1895 L, which is about 679 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Toyota Land Cruiser to a small extent takes the win – 540 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 71 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
Toyota Land Cruiser
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £24,800
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
2.9 (10 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Toyota Land Cruiser
The Toyota Land Cruiser is the kind of SUV that makes you feel ready to abandon the map and take the long way home, with legendary go-anywhere capability wrapped in reassuringly solid build quality. Inside it's surprisingly comfortable and grown-up — a practical luxury for buyers who want reliability and presence rather than fleeting flash.
details
Ford Puma
Toyota Land Cruiser
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
70700 - 79300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
10.6 - 10.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
278 - 284 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
80 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Off-Roader
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 7
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
2610 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 L
|
Trunk capacity
143 - 742 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4925 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1980 mm
|
|
Height
1550 mm
|
Height
1935 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1829 - 1895 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
540 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
205 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.30 s
|
|
Max Speed
190 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
500 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
151 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2755 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025 - 2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.