VS

Ford Puma vs Toyota Land Cruiser comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 205 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 72,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Land Cruiser?

Ford Puma vs Toyota Land Cruiser: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
details

Toyota Land Cruiser

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Toyota Land Cruiser costs 72,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 48,077 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Toyota Land Cruiser with 10.6 L/100km. The difference is about 5.2 L/100km.

Land Cruiser

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Land Cruiser offers moderately more power – delivering 205 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 37 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Toyota Land Cruiser takes 12.3 s. That’s about 4.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Land Cruiser delivers clearly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 210 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Toyota Land Cruiser offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,415 kg. The difference is around 1,099 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota Land Cruiser carries clearly more – 750 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 281 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
Ford Puma
Toyota Land Cruiser

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details

Toyota Land Cruiser

The Toyota Land Cruiser is the kind of SUV that makes you feel ready to abandon the map and take the long way home, with legendary go-anywhere capability wrapped in reassuringly solid build quality. Inside it's surprisingly comfortable and grown-up — a practical luxury for buyers who want reliability and presence rather than fleeting flash.

details
Ford Puma
Toyota Land Cruiser

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
72,000 - 79,700 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
10.6 - 10.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
278 - 282 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Off-Roader
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
2,415 - 2,450 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
143 - 742 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,980 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
685 - 750 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
205 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
500 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
151 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
2,755 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Toyota
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.