Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Toyota Proace Bus comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 180 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 31,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Toyota Proace Bus?
Ford Puma vs Toyota Proace Bus: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Toyota Proace Bus costs 31,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,650 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Toyota Proace Bus with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 24.2 kWh/100km for the Toyota Proace Bus. That’s a difference of about 11.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 74 km more than the Toyota Proace Bus.
Proace Bus
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota Proace Bus offers barely more power – delivering 180 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Toyota Proace Bus takes 13.3 s. That’s about 5.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota Proace Bus delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Toyota Proace Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,835 kg. The difference is around 519 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota Proace Bus carries considerably more – 1,265 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 796 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma leads convincingly in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Toyota Proace Bus
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Toyota Proace Bus
The Toyota Proace Bus is a pragmatic people‑mover that swallows passengers and luggage with the kind of everyday practicality fleet managers and large families will appreciate. It may not thrill the enthusiast, but its sensible layout, sturdy build and Toyota badge make it a dependable, no-nonsense choice for anyone needing space and reliability rather than flash.
details
Ford Puma
Toyota Proace Bus
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
31,600 - 57,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 - 6.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
24.2 - 24.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
218 - 343 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Bus
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5 - 9
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,835 - 2,140 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
825 - 1,265 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 180 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 400 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 132 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,184 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, F, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Toyota
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.