VS

Ford Puma vs Volvo EX40 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo EX40?

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Ford Puma has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the Volvo EX40 costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 18077 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s distinct more efficient than the Volvo EX40 with 16.60 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.50 kWh.

As for range, the Volvo EX40 performs evident better – achieving up to 576 km, about 200 km more than the Ford Puma.

EX40 @ media.volvocars.com

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 has a clearly edge – offering 442 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 274 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.60 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs somewhat better – reaching 210 km/h, while the Volvo EX40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 30 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX40 pulls convincingly stronger with 670 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 380 Nm difference.

Puma @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1316 kg compared to 2040 kg. The difference is around 724 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers evident more room – 523 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 113 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX40 performs slight better – up to 1400 L, which is about 117 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, Volvo EX40 minimal takes the win – 480 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo EX40 proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo EX40 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,800
311247_XC40_Recharge

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 - 17.6 kWh
  • Electric Range : 480 - 576 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 represents a new chapter in the brand's commitment to sustainability and innovation, combining elegant Scandinavian design with cutting-edge electric vehicle technology. With its spacious interior and intuitive technology, the EX40 provides a comfortable and connected driving experience. The focus on eco-friendly materials and efficient performance makes it an attractive choice for those seeking a responsible and stylish drive.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge @ media.volvocars.com
311246_XC40_Recharge @ media.volvocars.com
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo @ media.volvocars.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising range, a spacious interior and brilliant value, making it the smarter, cleaner pick for everyday running.
Ford Puma
Volvo EX40
Puma
EX40

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
42800 - 58200 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
2040 - 2170 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
410 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4440 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1647 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1286 - 1400 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
430 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Ford
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
Think of the Volvo EX40 as the cool, safety-obsessed Swede — minimalist cabin, clever tech and a calm, premium feel — while the Skoda Elroq is all about everyday practicality: roomy, sensible and great value for money. Want Scandinavian refinement and understated luxury? Pick the EX40; want space, utility and a smarter wallet decision, the Elroq has your back.
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX40
VS
The Skoda Enyaq bundles generous space, sensible packaging and impressive range into a down‑to‑earth package that undercuts rivals on price and practicality. The Volvo EX40, by contrast, offers sharper styling, a posher interior and tauter handling — Scandi calm and high‑tech polish for buyers who prefer premium flair over rear‑seat legroom.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers petrol, hybrid and electric options plus proven practicality. Go for the EX40 if you want cutting‑edge EV efficiency and playful agility; pick the XC40 if you value versatility, a broader engine choice and tried‑and‑tested everyday usefulness.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.