Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Volvo EX90 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo EX90?
Ford Puma vs Volvo EX90: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 48,248 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is visibly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 17.8 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX90. That’s a difference of about 4.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 203 km more than the Ford Puma.
EX90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 512 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers considerably more torque with 870 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 580 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Volvo EX90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 1,239 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX90 carries clearly more – 605 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 136 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX90 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £72,200
Volvo EX90
Ford Puma
Volvo EX90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Volvo EX90
The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.
details
Ford Puma
Volvo EX90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
6 - 7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,964 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
545 - 605 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.