Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Volvo S60 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 42,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo S60?
Ford Puma vs Volvo S60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Ford Puma is clearly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Volvo S60 costs 42,500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,600 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S60 uses 0.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.7 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers considerably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 323 km more than the Volvo S60.
S60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S60 offers clearly more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 287 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S60 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S60 delivers clearly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 419 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,715 kg. The difference is around 399 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more boot space – 523 L compared to 427 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo S60 carries only slightly more – 475 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £42,500
Volvo S60
Ford Puma
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Volvo S60
The Volvo S60 wears Scandinavian understatement like a tailored suit, pairing a serene cabin with composed handling that makes the daily commute feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers after executive looks, rock‑solid safety and practical versatility — with a dash of discreet luxury — it's a persuasive pick that doesn't need to shout for attention.
details
Ford Puma
Volvo S60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
42,500 - 65,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.7 - 7.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
94 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
16 - 161 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,715 - 2,039 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
390 - 427 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,778 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,431 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
461 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.