Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Volvo S90 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 62,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo S90?
Ford Puma vs Volvo S90: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Volvo S90 costs 62,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 38,314 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo S90 uses 0.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 328 km more than the Volvo S90.
S90
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo S90 offers substantially more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 287 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo S90 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.7 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo S90 delivers clearly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 419 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,912 kg. The difference is around 596 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers a bit more boot space – 523 L compared to 453 L. That’s a difference of about 70 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo S90 carries marginally more – 518 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 49 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo S90 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £62,200
Volvo S90
Ford Puma
Volvo S90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Volvo S90
The Volvo S90 is a composed, elegant luxury sedan that dresses Scandinavian restraint in a quietly imposing package. It prioritises serene highway manners and a calm, tech‑savvy cabin, making it a car that suggests you deserve the nicer things in life without ever raising its voice.
details
Ford Puma
Volvo S90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
62,200 - 70,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
89 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.7 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
17 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
60 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,912 - 2,119 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
431 - 453 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,969 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,440 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
451 - 518 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
235 - 455 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.7 - 7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
480 - 709 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
173 - 335 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022 - 2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.