Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Volvo XC90 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 406 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 74,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Volvo XC90?
Ford Puma vs Volvo XC90: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Volvo XC90 costs 74,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 50,391 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC90 uses 3.4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 2 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers considerably more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 348 km more than the Volvo XC90.
XC90
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC90 offers significantly more power – delivering 406 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 238 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC90 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC90 delivers substantially more torque with 669 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 379 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Volvo XC90 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is substantially lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,080 kg. The difference is around 764 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC90 carries clearly more – 710 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 241 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Volvo XC90
The Volvo XC90 is a serene Scandinavian SUV that mixes minimalist luxury with a composed, confidence-inspiring presence — ideal for buyers who want family practicality without sacrificing style. Inside it serves up a calm, well-crafted cabin and user-friendly tech that keeps long journeys pleasant and tantrums to a minimum, making the XC90 a smart, stylish pick for sensible drivers.
details
Ford Puma
Volvo XC90
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
74,300 - 84,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.4 - 8.3 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
69 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
71 - 188 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,080 - 2,350 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
600 - 710 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
250 - 406 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
360 - 669 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
184 - 299 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.