VS

Ford Puma vs VW Caddy Compact Van comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 25,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or VW Caddy Compact Van?

Ford Puma vs VW Caddy Compact Van: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
details

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • clearly more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma is only slightly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the VW Caddy Compact Van costs 25,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,907 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Caddy Compact Van uses 0.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 4.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers clearly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 297 km more than the VW Caddy Compact Van.

Caddy Compact Van

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW Caddy Compact Van delivers very slightly more torque with 320 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is very slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,442 kg. The difference is around 126 kg.

When it comes to payload, the VW Caddy Compact Van carries noticeably more – 759 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 290 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW Caddy Compact Van is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,800
Caddy Compact Van

VW Caddy Compact Van

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 117 - 120 km
Ford Puma
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details

VW Caddy Compact Van

The VW Caddy is a clever compact van that turns urban chores into something almost enjoyable, thanks to smart packaging and a cabin that refuses to feel like punishment. For buyers who want useful practicality without drama, the Caddy is a tidy, dependable choice that quietly gets the job done while remaining surprisingly pleasant to drive.

details
Ford Puma
VW Caddy Compact Van

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
25,800 - 42,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 6.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
117 - 120 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
19.7 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
11 - 154 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
4 - 5
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,818 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
4,500 - 4,853 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,855 mm
Height
-
Height
1,819 - 1,823 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 3,700 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
628 - 759 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
102 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
175 - 186 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
220 - 320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
75 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,968 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
Brand
Ford
Brand
VW
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.