VS

Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-80 comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Mazda CX-80?

Ford Ranger vs Mazda CX-80: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • only slightly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
details

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more power
  • visibly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Ranger is only slightly cheaper – starting at 48,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 889 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers visibly more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 18 km more than the Ford Ranger.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers moderately more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 281 HP. That’s roughly 46 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Ford Ranger takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers visibly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 147 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is a bit lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 274 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries markedly more – 989 kg compared to 650 kg. That’s a difference of about 339 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T60 MAX
VS
If you're choosing between the Ford Ranger and the Maxus T60 MAX, you're weighing a proven, globally popular midsize pickup against a newer, value-focused contender. I’ll compare their practicality, performance, comfort and running costs so you can pick the one that best fits your workday and …
Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
CAF9EC78-BCC5-44DD-A6CB-AA214C4B486C
A5679221-BE7E-4493-B2BF-37FB664B42A8

Reviews Ford Ranger

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Ford Ranger
Maxus T90 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Ford Ranger or the Maxus T90 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Ford Ranger
Maxus eTERRON 9
VS
The Ford Ranger and Maxus eTERRON 9 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Ranger
Isuzu D-Max
VS
In the competitive midsize pickup segment, the Ford Ranger and Isuzu D-Max offer robust performance and versatility for both work and recreation. The Ranger impresses with its powerful engine options and advanced technology features, while the D-Max is renowned for its durability and off-road …
Ford Ranger
Land Rover Defender
VS
In the realm of rugged all-terrain vehicles, the Ford Ranger and the Land Rover Defender stand out as iconic contenders. The Ford Ranger offers exceptional versatility and practicality, designed with a focus on comfort and modern technology, making it an excellent choice for both urban and off-road …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Ford Ranger
Mazda CX-80

Costs and Consumption
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
91 - 146 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Ford Ranger have?

The Ford Ranger is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.