VS

Ford Ranger vs Renault Master Transporter comparison

Compare performance (281 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (48,400 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Ranger or Renault Master Transporter?

Ford Ranger vs Renault Master Transporter: Key differences

Ford Ranger

  • visibly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Master Transporter

  • markedly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • moderately lighter
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Ranger

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Master Transporter is markedly cheaper – starting at 38,600 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,792 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Renault Master Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 3.7 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault Master Transporter offers considerably more range – reaching up to 448 km, about 406 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Master Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers visibly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 111 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers clearly more torque with 697 Nm compared to 380 Nm. That’s about 317 Nm more.

Ranger

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Ford Ranger offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Master Transporter is moderately lighter – 2,128 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 277 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries significantly more – 1,846 kg compared to 989 kg. That’s a difference of about 857 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Ranger is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £48,400
Ranger

Ford Ranger

  • Engine Type : Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 240 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 42 km
Ford Ranger
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details

Renault Master Transporter

The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.

details
Ford Ranger
Renault Master Transporter

Costs and Consumption

Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Price
38,600 - 55,400 £
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
22.7 - 25.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
42 km
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
70 - 265 g/km
co2
0 - 318 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Pickup
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
3
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,918 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
845 - 989 kg
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
Ford
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.