Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
GWM ORA 07 vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (408 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (36,000 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – GWM ORA 07 or Skoda Enyaq?
GWM ORA 07 vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
ORA 07
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
GWM ORA 07 is only slightly cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 857 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 16.5 kWh/100km for the GWM ORA 07. That’s a difference of about 1.6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers moderately more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 69 km more than the GWM ORA 07.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the GWM ORA 07 offers somewhat more power – delivering 408 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the GWM ORA 07 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.5 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the GWM ORA 07 delivers very slightly more torque with 680 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 1 Nm more.
ORA 07
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, GWM ORA 07 is very slightly lighter – 2,065 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 9 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more boot space – 585 L compared to 333 L. That’s a difference of about 252 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries clearly more – 526 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 176 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Enyaq holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £36,800
Skoda Enyaq
GWM ORA 07
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
GWM ORA 07
The GWM ORA 07 arrives as a cheeky, fashion-forward electric crossover that blends retro-modern styling with practical everyday sense, so it’s as happy in city traffic as it is turning heads on the boulevard. Inside you get a comfy, tech-rich cabin and sensible packaging without a premium sticker, making it a smart pick for buyers who want personality and value in one neat package.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
GWM ORA 07
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36,000 - 45,800 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.5 - 17.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
440 - 520 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,210 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
333 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,862 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
350 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 - 408 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.5 - 8.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
340 - 680 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
150 - 300 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
GWM
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.