Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Honda e:Ny1 vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (204 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Honda e:Ny1 or Ford Puma?
Honda e:Ny1 vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
e:Ny1
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Honda e:Ny1 costs 33,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,506 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is clearly more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 18.2 kWh/100km for the Honda e:Ny1. That’s a difference of about 5.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 5 km more than the Honda e:Ny1.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Honda e:Ny1 offers a bit more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda e:Ny1 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Honda e:Ny1 delivers only slightly more torque with 310 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm more.
e:Ny1
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is clearly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,730 kg. The difference is around 414 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 361 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries clearly more – 469 kg compared to 350 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Honda e:Ny1
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Honda e:Ny1
The Honda e:Ny1 arrives as a cheeky, compact electric crossover that blends bold styling with clever practicality, perfect for city life and weekend escapes. Inside it's clean and tech-forward, offering a relaxed driving experience with enough space and refinement to make daily commutes feel surprisingly grown-up — and yes, the smile factor is real.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Honda e:Ny1
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 36,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
412 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,730 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
344 - 361 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4,387 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,790 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,584 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,136 - 1,176 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
350 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.