VS

Hyundai Bayon vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (90 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (20,500 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Hyundai Bayon or Ford Puma?

Hyundai Bayon vs Ford Puma: Key differences

Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • barely more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Bayon

Ford Puma VS Hyundai Bayon — a practical, searchable comparison for small‑SUV buyers

Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon sit on the same compact SUV shelf but aim at different kinds of buyers: the Puma sells a bit of driving fun with clever storage ideas, while the Bayon sells straightforward value and everyday space. This comparison looks beyond spec sheets to how each car actually feels in traffic, on the motorway and when you’re loading the kids and the weekend kit. Expect clear contrasts in driving character, cabin logic and what you sacrifice for price or personality. Read on to see which one aligns with your weekly routine rather than just the headline figures.

Puma

Character and driving dynamics

The Ford Puma feels lively and composed, with steering and body control that make it more entertaining on twisty B‑roads; the Hyundai Bayon leans toward a neutral, gather‑your‑shopping‑and‑go temperament. Puma’s sharper chassis gives drivers confidence and a sense of connectedness, which rewards anyone who values engagement on the commute. Bayon’s lighter steering and softer focus are easier in stop‑and‑go city use but won’t thrill you on a country run. If you prioritise spirited handling, the Puma will feel more satisfying; if you want undemanding, predictable behavior, the Bayon is the calmer companion.

Bayon

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

On longer journeys the Ford Puma’s firm setup and supportive front seats keep you planted and composed, though its three‑cylinder character can sound busy at low revs and the rear seats are tight for tall passengers. The Hyundai Bayon trades some personality for a more relaxed overall ride and slightly more forgiving rear accommodation, making it less fatiguing for back‑seat passengers over hours. Wind and road noise are broadly similar at motorway speeds, but Bayon’s packaging gives it a marginally more insulated feel during steady cruising. Choose the Puma if you want an engaging long‑distance car with firm support up front; pick the Bayon if rear passenger comfort and a gentler ride matter more.

Puma

Practicality and everyday usability

Practicality is a real contrast: the Ford Puma’s inventive MegaBox and wide loading aperture make it the pick for muddy boots, sports kit or awkward cargo that benefits from a low, washable compartment. The Hyundai Bayon answers with straightforward, roomy luggage capacity and a more conventionally usable boot that suits family shopping and prams without special tricks. Rear seat space favors the Bayon for taller occupants, where the Puma’s clever boot doesn’t fully compensate for the tighter back‑seat room. If you regularly carry wet or dirty gear the Puma’s solution is uniquely handy; if you need predictable space for passengers and cargo every day, the Bayon is the more pragmatic choice.

Bayon

Cabin feel, controls and perceived quality

The Ford Puma presents a modern cockpit with large screens and a fresher visual layout, but it also pushes many functions into touch controls that demand attention while driving. The Hyundai Bayon keeps things tactile: physical buttons and a simpler layout make operation intuitive and less distracting, even if the cabin plastics feel more utilitarian. Perceived quality therefore splits along preference — Puma looks more contemporary, Bayon feels more user‑friendly. If you prize a touchscreen‑led modern interior, the Puma will impress visually; if you want straightforward ergonomics and durable surfaces, the Bayon will disappoint less over time.

Puma

Buyer fit — who should choose which car next?

Decide on priorities: the Ford Puma suits drivers who want a compact SUV that’s fun to drive, clever with cargo (the MegaBox is a real everyday advantage) and willing to pay a premium for personality and tech. The Hyundai Bayon will appeal to buyers who prioritise value, warranty coverage and a no‑nonsense cabin with easy controls and better rear‑seat usability. For small families or cost‑conscious buyers who want a dependable, roomy runabout the Bayon is the safer, more economical bet in daily life. If you want to see how those real‑world differences map to power, weight and economy, the technical comparison that follows will show which specifications reinforce the impressions above.

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Bayon
Hyundai i20
VS
Choosing between the Hyundai Bayon and the Hyundai i20 comes down to whether you prefer a compact crossover with higher ride height and extra practicality (Bayon) or a sharper, more efficient hatchback with sportier handling (i20). I’ll compare their space, driving feel, fuel economy and equipment …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Bayon

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Hyundai Bayon is a bit cheaper – starting at 20,500 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,429 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Hyundai Bayon with 5.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers clearly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 90 HP. That’s roughly 78 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Hyundai Bayon takes 11.9 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers significantly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 172 Nm. That’s about 118 Nm more.

Bayon

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Hyundai Bayon is slightly lighter – 1,175 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 141 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers noticeably more boot space – 523 L compared to 411 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 9 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Hyundai Bayon
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Hyundai Bayon

The Hyundai Bayon slips neatly between city runabout and small SUV, offering surprising practicality and a fresh, confident design that stands out in urban traffic. It's an easy buy for shoppers who want smart packaging, tidy handling and a dash of personality without fuss — a sensible little crossover that makes everyday driving a bit more enjoyable.

details
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-02
hyundai-all-new-bayon-static-08
hyundai-all-new-bayon-interior-01
hyundai-all-new-bayon-details-06

Reviews Hyundai Bayon

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Janusz
29 Apr 2026, 09:15:55

Definitely the Hyundai Bayon — the most important thing is the simply designed 1.2 MPI four-cylinder engine, 84 hp, adapted for LPG and cheap to repair, beautiful looks, a five-year warranty, cheaper to buy, and performance completely sufficient for a senior. A four-cylinder engine runs smoother and is better refined. I will buy this car in December 2026 at the Hyundai dealership in Toruń.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
André CGARLIER
20 Jan 2026, 19:35:46

I bought the HUNDAY BAYON one month ago.
600 km later, first small problem — the gauge stopped working.
I have an appointment set for 15 days from now. That said, it’s a real pleasure to drive: very smooth, lively acceleration, comfortable and perfect visibility. 800 km on the clock, but I’ve noticed city fuel consumption is much higher than advertised — 9.7 litres/100 km, mostly urban driving.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Hyundai Bayon
Kia Stonic
VS
Small crossover, big decisions: the Hyundai Bayon and Kia Stonic duke it out in the compact SUV ring, each promising city-smarts, style and sensible running costs. One brings bold tech and fresh looks, the other leans on practicality and value — so let’s see which small SUV deserves your keys (and …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Nissan Qashqai comes down to whether you value a punchy, city-friendly crossover with sharp handling and clever storage or a more spacious, comfort-focused compact SUV for longer journeys. The Puma excels at engaging driving dynamics and smart packaging, while …
Hyundai Bayon
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
20,500 - 26,200 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
130 - 132 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,175 - 1,200 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
411 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,775 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 460 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
90 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.9 - 13.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
172 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
66 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
998 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
Hyundai
Brand
Ford
What drive types are available for the Hyundai Bayon?

The Hyundai Bayon is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.