Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Jaguar I-Pace vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (400 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (79,200 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Jaguar I-Pace or Ford Puma?
Jaguar I-Pace vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
I-Pace
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Jaguar I-Pace costs 79,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 55,286 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is substantially more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 25.2 kWh/100km for the Jaguar I-Pace. That’s a difference of about 12.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Jaguar I-Pace offers a bit more range – reaching up to 469 km, about 52 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Jaguar I-Pace offers substantially more power – delivering 400 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 232 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Jaguar I-Pace is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Jaguar I-Pace delivers substantially more torque with 696 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 406 Nm more.
I-Pace
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,226 kg. The difference is around 910 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Jaguar I-Pace offers slightly more boot space – 638 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 115 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries marginally more – 469 kg compared to 444 kg. That’s a difference of about 25 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Jaguar I-Pace
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Jaguar I-Pace
The Jaguar I-Pace pairs instantaneous electric shove with graceful, feline looks, so it never feels like you're piloting a refrigerator with style. Inside it serves proper Jaguar luxury and clever packaging, making it a tempting choice for buyers who want EV convenience without losing personality.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Jaguar I-Pace
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
79,200 - 85,500 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
25.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
469 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
84.7 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,226 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
638 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4,682 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,011 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,566 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,453 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
444 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
400 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
696 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
294 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Jaguar
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.