Compare performance (207 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (33,400 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Torres EVX or Skoda Enyaq?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
KGM Torres EVX is slightly cheaper – starting at 33,400 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 36,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,428 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 19.3 kWh/100km for the KGM Torres EVX. That’s a difference of about 4.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers slightly more range – reaching up to 589 km, about 86 km more than the KGM Torres EVX.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Enyaq offers visibly more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 133 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Enyaq is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the KGM Torres EVX takes 8.2 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers clearly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 340 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, KGM Torres EVX is only slightly lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 149 kg.
Looking at boot space, the KGM Torres EVX offers somewhat more boot space – 703 L compared to 585 L. That’s a difference of about 118 L.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 526 kg compared to 510 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.
The Skoda Enyaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Torres EVX presents itself as a practical and polished electric SUV, pairing a spacious, comfortable interior with a clean, contemporary design. With composed road manners and user-friendly technology, it feels like a sensible choice for drivers seeking an everyday electric family vehicle.
details
The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33,400 - 42,000 £
|
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.3 - 19.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
498 - 503 km
|
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 1,950 kg
|
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
703 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
485 - 510 kg
|
Payload
449 - 526 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
207 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
339 Nm
|
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
152 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
KGM
|
Brand
Skoda
|