Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (186 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Ford Puma?
Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
3 Hatchback
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is barely cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda 3 Hatchback costs 25,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,106 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is only slightly more efficient than the Mazda 3 Hatchback with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda 3 Hatchback offers very slightly more power – delivering 186 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers slightly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
3 Hatchback
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,417 kg. The difference is around 101 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 172 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda 3 Hatchback carries very slightly more – 502 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda 3 Hatchback
The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 146 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
351 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,795 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
487 - 502 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.