VS

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (25,000 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda 3 Hatchback or Toyota C-HR+?

Mazda 3 Hatchback vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

Toyota C-HR+

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

3 Hatchback

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda 3 Hatchback is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,000 £ , while the Toyota C-HR+ costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 10,971 £.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers considerably more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 157 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the Mazda 3 Hatchback takes 8 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Toyota C-HR+ delivers markedly more torque with 338 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 98 Nm more.

3 Hatchback

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda 3 Hatchback is clearly lighter – 1,417 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 393 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR+ offers slightly more boot space – 416 L compared to 351 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries visibly more – 655 kg compared to 502 kg. That’s a difference of about 153 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda 3 Hatchback

The Mazda 3 hatchback blends elegant design with a surprisingly sporty drive, giving a cabin that feels more upscale than you’d expect for the segment. Practical enough for everyday life yet eager to entertain behind the wheel, it’s a smart, good-humored choice that makes even grocery runs feel like a mini escape.

details
2022_mazda3_spain_act_23_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_act_15_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_still_14_highres
2022_mazda3_spain_int_01_highres
2022_mazda3_pq_spain_int_05_highres

Reviews Mazda 3 Hatchback

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
j m
29 Jun 2026, 22:06:55

power
efficiency and low consumption
driving pleasure
wonderful e-drive and head-up projection display on the windshield

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Krzysztof
17 Jun 2026, 07:19:28

More comfortable
Visually bigger and nicer
Low energy consumption.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Skoda Enyaq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Škoda Enyaq and the Toyota C‑HR represent very different takes on the modern crossover: the Enyaq is a roomy, all‑electric SUV focused on practicality and range, while the C‑HR is a compact, style‑led crossover available with petrol and hybrid powertrains. Which suits you depends on whether you …
Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Toyota C-HR+
Subaru Uncharted
VS
Comparing the Toyota C-HR and the Subaru Uncharted shows two different takes on the compact crossover idea: the C-HR prioritizes sharp styling and urban efficiency, while the Uncharted leans into rugged capability and off-road readiness. Choosing between them comes down to whether you value …
Toyota Urban Cruiser
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Comparing the Toyota Urban Cruiser and the Toyota C-HR, you’re choosing between a practical, city-focused compact SUV that emphasizes efficiency and easy maneuverability and a more stylized, tech-forward crossover that leans toward a sportier driving feel and premium touches. If your priority is …
Mazda 3 Hatchback
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,000 - 36,000 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,417 - 1,529 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
351 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
487 - 502 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Mazda 3 Hatchback?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.