VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Omoda 5 - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (186 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (25200 £ vs 23100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Omoda 5?

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Omoda 5

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Omoda 5 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23100 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2092 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-30 manages with 5.70 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.50 L. The difference is about 1.80 L per 100 km.

5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 has a slight edge – offering 204 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is minimal quicker – completing the sprint in 7.80 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.30 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Omoda 5 pulls to a small extent stronger with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm difference.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers convincingly more room – 430 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 430 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-30
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L
details

Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Omoda 5

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Omoda 5

5 (3 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus LBX and Mazda CX-30 both epitomize the blend of luxury and practicality in the compact SUV segment. While the LBX offers a more upscale interior with advanced technology and refined design, the CX-30 impresses with its sporty handling and distinctive styling. Ultimately, the choice …
Mazda CX-30
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
25200 - 36800 £
Price
23100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L
Consumption L/100km
7.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
-
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1455 - 1587 kg
Curb weight
-
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
-
Length
4424 mm
Width
1795 mm
Width
1830 mm
Height
-
Height
1588 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1075 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.80 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
220 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
145 kW
Engine capacity
1998 - 2488 cm3
Engine capacity
1598 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Omoda

Similar Comparisons

Omoda 5
Opel Mokka
VS
The Omoda 5 and Opel Mokka compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan Qashqai
Omoda 5
VS
In the realm of compact SUVs, the Nissan Qashqai and the Omoda 5 present a compelling matchup, each vying for dominance with their distinct attributes. The Qashqai, renowned for its reliability and refined driving dynamics, offers a well-rounded package with enhanced safety features and improved …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
MG ZS and Omoda 5 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the battle between the Mazda CX-30 and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both vehicles showcase their unique strengths in the subcompact SUV segment. The CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it a top choice for those who prioritize comfort and performance. …
Omoda 5
MG HS
VS
The Omoda 5 and MG HS offer compelling choices in the competitive compact SUV segment, each bringing unique strengths to the table. The Omoda 5 impresses with its avant-garde design and tech-savvy interior, packed with features that appeal to modern, tech-oriented drivers. In contrast, the MG HS …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG MGS5 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 and Nissan Qashqai stand out with their distinctive qualities. The Mazda CX-30 impresses with its sporty styling and superior driving dynamics, making it a joy for those who value performance and aesthetics. In contrast, the Nissan Qashqai offers …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

The Mazda CX-30 is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.