VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Omoda 5 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 204 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 23,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Omoda 5?

Mazda CX-30 vs Omoda 5: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly more efficient
  • substantially more trunk space

Omoda 5

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Omoda 5 is barely cheaper – starting at 23,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-30 costs 25,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,092 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-30 uses 5.7 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Omoda 5 with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.8 L/100km.

5

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Omoda 5 offers very slightly more power – delivering 204 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Omoda 5 is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.8 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Omoda 5 delivers a bit more torque with 290 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-30 offers substantially more boot space – 430 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 430 L.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-30 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £25,200
CX-30

Mazda CX-30

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 140 - 186 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS plays the sensible family card with roomy practicality and a wallet-friendly price, while the Omoda 5 arrives like the showy new kid on the block, sporting sharper styling and richer tech. Pick the ZS for straightforward comfort and low running costs; choose the Omoda 5 if you want …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Mazda CX-30
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Omoda 5

The Omoda 5 arrives as a stylish, tech-forward compact crossover that punches above its class with bold design and a surprisingly premium cabin. It’s an attractive choice for buyers who want modern gadgets, confident road manners and value without the usual showroom drama.

details
IMG_2691

Reviews Omoda 5

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
maurizio
22 Nov 2025, 17:34:12

Depending on your needs: better for safety, comfort, boot space, trim and performance — downside: higher fuel consumption.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Nissan Qashqai
Omoda 5
VS
In the compact-crossover ring the Nissan Qashqai plays the reliable all‑rounder — comfortable ride, polished interior and a strong dealer network that makes it an easy, practical buy for families. The Omoda 5 is the flashy newcomer: dramatic design, generous tech kit and excellent value, but you …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Omoda 5
MG MGS5 EV
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the MG MGS5 EV is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Omoda 5
MG HS/EHS
VS
Omoda 5 and MG HS/EHS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Omoda 5
Opel Frontera
VS
Unsure whether the Omoda 5 or the Opel Frontera is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-30
Omoda 5

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
23,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
-
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
51 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
-
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
0 L
Length
-
Length
4,424 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
1,588 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,075 L
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
-

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
204 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
220 km/h
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
145 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
-
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Omoda
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.